🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are considering similar measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and platforms are "stealing our kids' youth". Legislation could be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban remains "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on parliament to pass a bill raising the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged parents to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a non-binding statement calling for a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. While it highlights of the "addictive" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A strong age restriction is a solid starting point," said one MEP supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the government has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "based on conclusive data".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the matter.

Campaign organizations have raised warnings. An organization founded by the family of a girl who was lost after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for young users," commented a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, legislation is mostly happening at the local government level due to national gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation restricting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with additional time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly passed bills demanding adult authorization for teenagers to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some individuals to copy the Australian path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Beyond the West, additional countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia aims to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, world bodies take a more nuanced stance. Unicef has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The body points out that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

While this global conversation continues, the actions of the Australian government and several other countries show that states globally are less and less willing to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.